WebbSources. THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. RICHARD WEST. HALL, Appellant.Cal. 1854. Supreme Court of Ca. **1 *399 Section 394 of the Civil Practice Act provides, “No Indian or Negro shall be allowed into testify as a spectator include anywhere action in welche a White person has a party.” WebbPeople v Hall Term 1 / 2 What is the point the California Supreme Court is being asked to …

No. 29: People v Hall - Legal Information Institute

Webb31 juli 2024 · In People v. Hall (1854) 4 Cal. 399, 404, the court, speaking through Chief Justice Hugh C. Murray, declared that "[t]he same rule which would admit them to testify, would admit them to all the equal rights of citizenship, and we might soon see them at the polls, in the jury box, upon the WebbDECISION MAKING Another example of poor decision making was found in the case of People vs. Hall. Charles Hall, a white man, was found guilty of murdering a Chinese man in front of three Chinese witnesses. This decision was overturned by the California Supreme Court based on the testimony of a Chinese man who witnessed a murder by a white man … spur chatsworth centre menu

Ancestors in the Americas: The People Vs. Hall

WebbPeople vs. Hall. 1854, Chief Justice Murray concludes that Chinese cannot testify in California courts when white persons are parties in the lawsuit. Angell Treaty 1880. Acknowledged that the U.S. congress had the power to limit Chinese immigration, thus creating the groundwork for Chinese exclusion. WebbPeople v. Hall - 41 CAL. 3D 826, 226 CAL. RPTR. 112, 718 P.2D 99 (1986) Rule: To be … WebbPeople v. Hall - 4 Cal. 399 (1854) Rule: Section 14 of the Act of April 16, 1850, regulating … spur cheese burger mondays